<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eHow UK Scam Part Deux: Or, When is an Answer Not an Answer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/</link>
	<description>Helping you to publish, promote, and protect your online presence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:56:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The eHow UK Scam Continues to Grow &#8211; The Content Writer &#124; Writing Online for Residual Income</title>
		<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>The eHow UK Scam Continues to Grow &#8211; The Content Writer &#124; Writing Online for Residual Income</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchydata.com/?p=690#comment-460</guid>
		<description>[...] but that&#8217;s not all. The newest eHow UK scam is over member profiles. Many members want their personal photos and profile text removed from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but that&#8217;s not all. The newest eHow UK scam is over member profiles. Many members want their personal photos and profile text removed from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howie</title>
		<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Howie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchydata.com/?p=690#comment-454</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is the “eHow way” these days. Scam your members, then skate around their questions like you’re Apolo Ohno.

Stay tuned for the eHow UK Scam Part Trois. Or be smart and run like hell.&quot;

Nice, relevant, injection of &#039;Apolo Ohno&#039;, Kim.....

...unfortunately, the part about &quot;running like hell&quot;, made me think of another Olympian, Usaine Bolt (last Summer Olympic Gold medalist).....and, even worse, I came to the realization that this scam could very well be flourishing long enough to see the next Summer Olympic Games (in which case, I would expect a mention of Usaine Bolt in one of your future posts....lol).....

Let&#039;s hope not. Fingers-crossed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is the “eHow way” these days. Scam your members, then skate around their questions like you’re Apolo Ohno.</p>
<p>Stay tuned for the eHow UK Scam Part Trois. Or be smart and run like hell.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nice, relevant, injection of &#8216;Apolo Ohno&#8217;, Kim&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8230;unfortunately, the part about &#8220;running like hell&#8221;, made me think of another Olympian, Usaine Bolt (last Summer Olympic Gold medalist)&#8230;..and, even worse, I came to the realization that this scam could very well be flourishing long enough to see the next Summer Olympic Games (in which case, I would expect a mention of Usaine Bolt in one of your future posts&#8230;.lol)&#8230;..</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope not. Fingers-crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchydata.com/?p=690#comment-453</guid>
		<description>I hear you, Rachel. It&#039;s not going to get any better, either. eHow has made it clear--for anyone with the eyes to see--that it does not intend to pay WCP writers much longer at all, much less to pay them fairly. You&#039;re smart to get out now.

Your own recent post about your &lt;a href=&quot;http://penmeetswallet.blogspot.com/2010/02/ehow-uk-compensation.html&quot;&gt;eHow UK compensation&lt;/a&gt; was interesting. I&#039;m guess eHow made far more than the $1.30 they &quot;compensated&quot; you for &quot;borrowing&quot; your articles. Readers might want to check out Rachel&#039;s blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you, Rachel. It&#8217;s not going to get any better, either. eHow has made it clear&#8211;for anyone with the eyes to see&#8211;that it does not intend to pay WCP writers much longer at all, much less to pay them fairly. You&#8217;re smart to get out now.</p>
<p>Your own recent post about your <a href="http://penmeetswallet.blogspot.com/2010/02/ehow-uk-compensation.html">eHow UK compensation</a> was interesting. I&#8217;m guess eHow made far more than the $1.30 they &#8220;compensated&#8221; you for &#8220;borrowing&#8221; your articles. Readers might want to check out Rachel&#8217;s blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchydata.com/?p=690#comment-452</guid>
		<description>I am very disconcerted with eHow right now. My earnings are pitiful, and quite frankly, I am giving up on this site that doesn&#039;t treat it&#039;s writers with enough respect to answer simple questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very disconcerted with eHow right now. My earnings are pitiful, and quite frankly, I am giving up on this site that doesn&#8217;t treat it&#8217;s writers with enough respect to answer simple questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchydata.com/?p=690#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Glorybug. 

As I read your comment, it occurred to me that Rosenblatt could have saved a good deal of eHow&#039;s net worth by either: 1. Not stealing content in the first place, or 2. Compensating properly and fairly after being caught. Because the Internet has a memory.

Any investor can run a quick search of the phrase, &quot;ehow is a scam&quot; (in quotes, or results are skewed to unrelated articles) and find 9,170 results. Try it. Okay, now search &quot;InfoBarrel is a scam.&quot; There are 0 results. ZERO. But InfoBarrel is relatively new, so let&#039;s look at &quot;HubPages is a scam,&quot; and consider those 5 results, four of which are actually stating that HupPages is NOT a scam and used the phrase for attention. Zero for &quot;Squidoo is a scam.&quot; Those three COMBINED have 5 search results for their names, in quotes, associated with the phrase, &quot;is a scam.&quot; eHow has 9,170 not counting &quot;eHow UK scam,&quot; at 1,480.

Do you think future investors will consider that significant? They will if they care about their money. Because those numbers will catch up with you, Demand Media, if they haven&#039;t already.

By scheming to deprive writers of their earnings, during the winter holidays, during one of the worst economic times this country has known, history will show that for want of principles, the Demand Media-eHow kingdom was ultimately lost. And that is as it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Glorybug. </p>
<p>As I read your comment, it occurred to me that Rosenblatt could have saved a good deal of eHow&#8217;s net worth by either: 1. Not stealing content in the first place, or 2. Compensating properly and fairly after being caught. Because the Internet has a memory.</p>
<p>Any investor can run a quick search of the phrase, &#8220;ehow is a scam&#8221; (in quotes, or results are skewed to unrelated articles) and find 9,170 results. Try it. Okay, now search &#8220;InfoBarrel is a scam.&#8221; There are 0 results. ZERO. But InfoBarrel is relatively new, so let&#8217;s look at &#8220;HubPages is a scam,&#8221; and consider those 5 results, four of which are actually stating that HupPages is NOT a scam and used the phrase for attention. Zero for &#8220;Squidoo is a scam.&#8221; Those three COMBINED have 5 search results for their names, in quotes, associated with the phrase, &#8220;is a scam.&#8221; eHow has 9,170 not counting &#8220;eHow UK scam,&#8221; at 1,480.</p>
<p>Do you think future investors will consider that significant? They will if they care about their money. Because those numbers will catch up with you, Demand Media, if they haven&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>By scheming to deprive writers of their earnings, during the winter holidays, during one of the worst economic times this country has known, history will show that for want of principles, the Demand Media-eHow kingdom was ultimately lost. And that is as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glorybug</title>
		<link>http://crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>glorybug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crunchydata.com/?p=690#comment-450</guid>
		<description>Great post.  Once again, you say exactly what is happening.  And, how nothing is being done about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  Once again, you say exactly what is happening.  And, how nothing is being done about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  crunchydata.com/ehow-uk-scam-part-deux/feed/ ) in 0.48390 seconds, on May 19th, 2012 at 1:37 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2012 at 2:37 am UTC -->
